PRP vs PRF
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right treatment
Botox vs DysportHydraFacial vs Chemical PeelMorpheus8 vs MicroneedlingCoolSculpting vs KybellaBotox vs Dermal FillersSculptra vs JuvedermLaser Hair Removal vs IPL Hair RemovalMorpheus8 vs UltherapyPRP vs PRFCO2 Laser vs Fraxel
Both are made from your own blood. PRF is the newer evolution with different processing for potentially enhanced results.
| PRP | PRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processing | High-speed + anticoagulant | Low-speed, no anticoagulant |
| Contents | Platelets in plasma | Platelets + WBC + stem cells |
| Release | Immediate burst | Slow over 10–14 days |
| Applications | Microneedling, injection, hair | Same + Bio Filler |
| Cost | $500–$1,500 | $500–$1,500 |
| Evidence | Decades | Growing |
The Verdict
PRF is the next evolution with more regenerative cells and sustained release. PRF Bio Filler is a natural filler alternative. Both are effective.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRF better?
More cells, longer release. Early studies are promising. PRP has more evidence.
What is Bio Filler?
PRF heated into injectable gel. Natural volume lasting 3–6 months.
Replace fillers?
PRF provides mild volume. Not equivalent to HA fillers for significant needs.